Advances in Computer Science : an International Journal
A Novel Performance Evaluation Approach for the College Teachers Based on Individual Contribution
Abstract
The performance evaluation to college teachers has very important theoretical significance and practical value. Therefore, a novel performance evaluation approach is proposed to the college teachers based on individual contribution. Experimental results suggest that this approach is feasible and efficacious.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen CT, Lin CT, Huang SF (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain manage-ment. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289-301
Gan Q, Zhang FC, Zhang ZY. Multi-objective optimal allo-cation for regional water resources based on ant colony op-timization algorithm. International Journal of Smart Home, 2015, 9(5): 103-110
Firouzabadi SMAK, Henson B, Barnes C (2008). A multi-ple stakeholders' approach to strategic selection decisions. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 54(4), 851-865
Yang YS, Xu BW, Li JJ. An improved genetic algorithm for fast configuration design of large-scale container cranes. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2015, 12(11): 4319-4330
Gumus AT (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transpor-tation firms by using a two-step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067-4074
Wang FJ, Li JL, Liu SW, et al. An improved adaptive genet-ic algorithm for image segmentation and vision alignment used in microelectronic bonding. IEEE / ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(3): 916-923
Abo-Sinna MA, Amer AH, Ibrahim AS (2008). Extensions of TOPSIS for large scale multi-objective non-linear pro-gramming problems with block angular structure. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32(3), 292-302
Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008). The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159(11), 1410-1428
Wang HF. Computer networks reliability using improved genetic algorithm optimization. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 2014, 32(6): 8737-8742
Lin MC, Wang CC, Chen MS, Chang CA (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59(1), 17-31
Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455
Changdar C, Mahapatra GS, Pal RK. An improved genetic algorithm based approach to solve constrained knapsack problem in fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Appli-cations, 2015, 42(4): 2276-2286
Wang TC, Chang TH (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 870-880
Zuo XQ, Chen C, Tan W, et al. Vehicle Scheduling of an Urban Bus Line via an Improved Multiobjective Genetic Al-gorithm. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(2): 1030-1041
Zou YY, Zhang YD, Li QH, et al. Improved multi-objective genetic algorithm based on parallel hybrid evolutionary theo-ry. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 2015, 8(1): 133-140
Wang YM, Elhag TMS (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309-319
Wang YJ, Lee HS (2007). Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 53(11), 1762-1772
